A reference work, not a recommendation to use: this profile describes mechanism and evidence and does not replace medical advice. The claims come from marketing and forums and are tested here, not endorsed.
Mechanism of action
Evidence map: Caffeine
Caffeine is a nonselective antagonist at adenosine receptors; at usual amounts, its stimulating effect rests on this blockade [1]. A PET study of 15 adults showed that, depending on its concentration in the blood, caffeine occupies 5 to 44% of cerebral A1 receptors; half-maximal displacement was at 67 µM, and with repeated consumption over the day, up to about half of A1 receptors could be occupied [1]. For the wake-promoting effect, the A2A receptor appears to be decisive: mice lacking the A1 receptor became more awake with caffeine, mice lacking the A2A receptor did not [2].
Caffeine is absorbed rapidly and completely and is broken down almost exclusively in the liver via cytochrome P450 enzymes, mainly CYP1A2, to paraxanthine as well as to theobromine and theophylline [3]. The half-life is about 5 hours [1] but varies widely: smoking, oral contraceptives, pregnancy, liver disease, and individual medications change its elimination [3].
It is disputed how much of the effect in habitual consumption is a real benefit. A review of experimental studies concluded that the improvements in performance and mood in regular consumers are almost entirely due to the reversal of withdrawal effects after brief abstinence, and that tolerance develops to the acute effect [4]. Other reviews emphasize the well-documented acute effects on alertness, sustained attention, and reaction time, while memory and higher executive functions respond inconsistently [5].
Targets
| Target | Type | Action | Key data | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adenosine A1 receptor | Receptor | Antagonist | half-maximal occupancy at 67 µM in plasma (human, PET) | Human, non-randomised[1] |
| Adenosine A2A receptor | Receptor | Antagonist | mediates the wake-promoting effect (knockout mice) | Animal study[2] |
Effect profile
- Dopamine
- Noradrenaline
- Serotonin
- Acetylcholine
- Glutamate · AMPA
- Glutamate · NMDA
- GABA
- Histamine
- Orexin
- AdenosineBlocks A1 receptors in the human brain (PET) and, via A2A, the sleep-promoting action of adenosine (mouse)[1][2]
- Opioids
- Melatonin
- Neurotrophins
- Blood flow
- Nitric oxide
- Energy metabolism
- Insulin · glucose
- Inflammation · oxidative
- Stress axis
- Testosterone axis
- Endocannabinoids
- Autophagy · senescence
- Immune system
- Lipid metabolism
- Coagulation · fibrinolysis
- Methylation
Human studies
PET of A1 receptor occupancy
Measured: A1 receptor occupancy
Result: 5–44% occupancy, concentration-dependent; half-maximal at 67 µM.[1]
Human, non-randomised
Review on withdrawal reversal
Measured: Performance and mood
Result: With long-term consumption, hardly any net benefit compared with abstinence; acute effects are subject to tolerance.[4]
Human, randomised
Review of cognitive and physical performance
Measured: Alertness, attention, reaction time, memory, executive functions
Result: Alertness, sustained attention, attention, and reaction time improved; memory and decisions inconsistent.[5]
Human, randomised
Withdrawal syndrome
Measured: Withdrawal symptoms
Result: Ten validated symptoms, including headache (50%), fatigue, concentration problems; clinically significant impairment in 13%.[6]
Human, randomised
Caffeine and subsequent sleep
Measured: Sleep duration, sleep efficiency, deep sleep
Result: Total sleep time −45 minutes, sleep efficiency −7%, deep sleep −11.4 minutes.[7]
Human, non-randomised
Pregnancy and birth weight
Measured: Low birth weight
Result: For each additional cup of coffee per day or so, a 13% higher risk (RR 1.13).[10]
Human, non-randomised
Risks and warnings
Poorer sleep
Shortens total sleep time by an average of 45 minutes and reduces deep sleep; the effect extends many hours beyond consumption [7].
Human, non-randomised
Withdrawal symptoms
After stopping in habitual consumers, headache, fatigue, concentration problems, and low mood, usually starting 12–24 hours after the last intake and lasting 2–9 days [6].
Human, randomised
Pregnancy
Higher consumption was associated with lower birth weight in cohort studies; causality has not been proven [10]. EFSA derived a lower intake without safety concerns for pregnant women than for other adults [9].
Human, non-randomised
Interactions
- Fluvoxamine, pipemidic acid, norfloxacin: Markedly inhibit the elimination of caffeine; most other medications hardly affect it [3].
- Smoking and oral contraceptives: Considerably change caffeine elimination via CYP1A2 [3].
Fact check: common claims
- supported
“Caffeine makes you more alert and attentive”
Acute effects on alertness, attention, and reaction time are well documented in controlled studies [5]; EFSA considered corresponding claims scientifically supported [8].
- not supported
“Regular coffee consumption permanently increases mental performance”
Compared with abstinence, long-term consumption shows hardly any net benefit; much of it is the reversal of withdrawal effects, and tolerance develops to the acute effect [4].
- partly supported
“Caffeine improves memory”
The results on memory and higher executive functions are inconsistent, unlike those on alertness and attention [5].
- refuted
“Coffee in the afternoon does not disturb nighttime sleep”
According to a meta-analysis, caffeine shortens sleep even when it is consumed many hours before bedtime [7].
Pharmacokinetics
- Absorption
- Rapidly and completely from the gut, without a notable first-pass effect [3].
- Half-life
- About 5 hours [1], strongly dependent on smoking, contraceptives, pregnancy, and liver health [3].
- Metabolism
- Almost exclusively liver, mainly CYP1A2; main metabolite paraxanthine, also theobromine and theophylline [3].
- Entry into the brain
- Occupies adenosine receptors in the human brain (PET) [1].
Legal status
- Germany
- Food constituent (coffee, tea, energy drinks); status as a medicinal product in tablet form not verified.
- EU
- In 2015, EFSA assessed the safety of caffeine and derived intakes without safety concerns for adults, pregnant women, and breastfeeding women [9]. EFSA considered health claims on alertness scientifically substantiated; the European Parliament rejected their authorization on health-protection grounds [8].
- USA
- Not verified.
- Other countries
- Sport: banned in competition from 1984 to 2004, since then removed from the WADA Prohibited List [9].
Related compounds
Open questions
- How large is the real net benefit of caffeine in people who consume it daily?
- What share do A1 and A2A receptors have in the cognitive effects in humans?
- Is the association with lower birth weight causal?
References
- Elmenhorst D, Meyer PT, Matusch A, Winz OH, Bauer A. Caffeine occupancy of human cerebral A1 adenosine receptors: in vivo quantification with 18F-CPFPX and PET. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(11):1723–9. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.105114 · PubMed
- Huang ZL, Qu WM, Eguchi N, Chen JF, Schwarzschild MA, Fredholm BB, et al. Adenosine A2A, but not A1, receptors mediate the arousal effect of caffeine. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(7):858–9. doi:10.1038/nn1491 · PubMed
- Grzegorzewski J, Bartsch F, Köller A, König M. Pharmacokinetics of caffeine: a systematic analysis of reported data for application in metabolic phenotyping and liver function testing. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12:752826. doi:10.3389/fphar.2021.752826 · PubMed
- James JE, Rogers PJ. Effects of caffeine on performance and mood: withdrawal reversal is the most plausible explanation. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2005;182(1):1–8. doi:10.1007/s00213-005-0084-6 · PubMed
- McLellan TM, Caldwell JA, Lieberman HR. A review of caffeine's effects on cognitive, physical and occupational performance. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;71:294–312. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.001 · PubMed
- Juliano LM, Griffiths RR. A critical review of caffeine withdrawal: empirical validation of symptoms and signs, incidence, severity, and associated features. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2004;176(1):1–29. doi:10.1007/s00213-004-2000-x · PubMed
- Gardiner C, Weakley J, Burke LM, Roach GD, Sargent C, Maniar N, et al. The effect of caffeine on subsequent sleep: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2023;69:101764. doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101764 · PubMed
- de Boer A. Fifteen years of regulating nutrition and health claims in Europe: the past, the present and the future. Nutrients. 2021;13(5):1725. doi:10.3390/nu13051725 · PubMed
- Diel P. Caffeine and doping – what have we learned since 2004. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2167. doi:10.3390/nu12082167 · PubMed
- Chen LW, Wu Y, Neelakantan N, Chong MF, Pan A, van Dam RM. Maternal caffeine intake during pregnancy is associated with risk of low birth weight: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2014;12:174. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0174-6 · PubMed
How this profile was checked
Last reviewed: 2026-10-23. All sources with a DOI or PMID were resolved automatically via Crossref or doi.org and PubMed.
Translated from the German profile (version of 2026-10-23); translation checked on 2026-10-26.
Checked
- All 10 DOIs resolved via Crossref and all PMIDs via PubMed with tools/pruefe_profile.py.
- Abstracts: nonselective antagonist, n = 15, 5–44%, 67 µM, up to 50% with repeated consumption, t½ ≈ 5 h [1]; A2A vs. A1 knockout [2]; CYP breakdown to paraxanthine, theobromine, theophylline [3]; withdrawal reversal, tolerance [4]; alertness, attention, reaction time, inconsistent for memory [5]; 57 + 9 studies, headache 50%, 13%, onset 12–24 h, duration 2–9 d [6]; 24 studies, −45 min, −7%, −11.4 min deep sleep [7]; RR 1.13 per increment, 90,747 participants [10].
- In the full text: fluvoxamine, pipemidic acid, norfloxacin inhibit caffeine clearance; influence of smoking and contraceptives [3]; EFSA considered four alertness claims substantiated, the Parliament rejected them [8]; EFSA safety opinion 2015 and WADA removal 2004 [9].
- ClinicalTrials.gov: 207 entries for “caffeine cognition” (October 23, 2026).
Not verified
- The EFSA opinions themselves (DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4102 and 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2054) were not retrievable as full text; their content is documented only via [8] and [9].
- The specific EFSA amounts without safety concerns were deliberately not adopted because of the “no dosages” rule.
- The direction of the influence of smoking and contraceptives on clearance was not found verbatim in the text checked; hence only “change”.
- Designs of the 24 sleep studies [7] not checked individually (hence evidence level 3).
No dosages, no sources of supply. This information does not replace medical advice.
Spotted an error or missing something?
Request a compound, suggest an improvement or report an error. Every message is read.
The website stores nothing. The button opens your email app with a pre-filled message.